JPR – Earth Precepts Program 12
Host: This week, Pepper Trail concludes our series on the
Earth Precepts by offering some final thoughts on taking responsibility for the
Earth:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the past 12 weeks, we
have explored a set of principles for acknowledging and acting on our
responsibility for the Earth. Here they
are, one last time:
☼
Honor the
Earth, upon which all life depends
☼
Consider
the consequences of all environmental actions over at least 100 years
☼
Do not
destabilize the Earth’s atmospheric or aquatic systems
☼
Do not
depend upon energy sources that cannot be replaced
☼
Do not
remove living resources, including soil, trees, and marine life, faster than
they can replace themselves
☼ Preserve the world’s biological diversity: all the Earth’s species and ecosystems
☼ Exploitation of the Earth must be accompanied by restoration of the
Earth
☼
Do not have
more than two children
☼
Do not
assert ownership over species or their genetic codes; they are not ours to claim
☼ Corporations
and governments share the same environmental responsibilities as
individuals; they must not be allowed to damage the Earth
These Earth Precepts are a
formidable set of injunctions, and they may seem overwhelming. Every day, all of us violate one or more of
them. Some may say: If the Earth Precepts cannot be followed,
they are meaningless.
But consider: the
Ten Commandments and other social precepts also seem quite impossible to
follow, if interpreted strictly. Most
religions accept some version of the commandment “Thou shalt not kill,” and yet
have sanctioned warfare throughout history. On a personal level, who doesn’t regularly
tell lies, or sometimes covet what another person has? Despite all these failings, almost everyone
accepts the Ten Commandments or related precepts as the basis for our moral
beliefs. Does this make us
hypocrites? Perhaps. And yet, our acceptance
of a core set of social principles unquestionably makes us better, more
responsible – more moral – people. When
we break our precepts, we feel guilt, that uncomfortable disconnect between our
beliefs and our actions that inhibits worse transgressions.
So, if the Earth Precepts
were accepted as universally as the Ten Commandments, would any of us be able
to follow them? No. Would the health of
the Earth, and thus the prospects for humanity’s future, improve? Unquestionably yes.
Another objection to the
Earth Precepts may be that they are vague and unscientific. But that is to misunderstand their
purpose. They are moral guidelines; they
are not laws or regulations. Each
society enacts laws to clarify its expectations regarding social precepts like
the Ten Commandments. For example, while
it may always be immoral to lie, it is only illegal to do so
under specific circumstances. In the
same way, laws are needed in each society to codify the concepts contained in
the Earth Precepts. These laws will
undoubtedly differ greatly from place to place, but those details are
unimportant compared to the transformation that acceptance of the concept of
earth precepts could mean.
Humanity’s days of environmental
innocence are over. We can no longer
pretend that we do not have responsibility for the biosphere. It’s essential that we accept this responsibility
and vow to preserve the health of the Earth.
Yes, we will repeatedly fall short in our efforts. But if we truly commit ourselves to the goal,
there is every reason for hope.
In Buddhism, there is a
ceremony associated with the mature acceptance of Buddha’s teachings. In this ceremony, the student swears to the
Four Great Bodhisattva Vows. The first
of these is: “Sentient beings are
numberless, I vow to save them.” This is
equally a Social and an Earth Precept.
By declaring our intention to save all living beings, we commit to a
goal that is both impossible and indispensable.
The bodhisattva and the ecologist share this knowledge: none are saved
unless all are saved. We have no choice
but to try.
This is Pepper Trail. Thank
you for listening.
▲ TRANSCRIPT LIST